Maybe the optimization of the 3D Mark for the Xabre wasn’t complete? This is the mode where the competitors have already won the authority and boast of a very good correlation of price, quality and speed. And this one is an analog of the ASUS SmartDoctor which monitors operation of a card in 3D, and if there are no running 3D applications it reduces a card’s frequency thus making lower heat dissipation and power consumption, as well as a cooler’s rotational speed. As for the tested sample, together with the ViewSonic P monitor and BNC Bargo cable it showed excellent quality at the following resolutions and frequencies: Last time the Xabre left not very good impression.
|Date Added:||13 November 2011|
|File Size:||8.36 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Scene with a large number of polygons In this test you should pay more attention to the minimal resolution where the fillrate makes almost no effect: However that may be, but this is not a hardware support because it came with just new drivers, not with a new chipset. By this warning we mean that overclocking is not a normal mode, and you should preserve your card from damages.
Andrey Vorobiev anvakams ixbt. Probably SIS tried to optimize the emulation, but the attempt failed. And now the DP3 relief: As you might remember, the Xabre’s drivers support 3 Turbo Modes which can be changed only in the Registry: I could assume that some xagre in the drivers of the Xabre worked bad and brought negative results remember the strange results of the matrix blending from the DX 8.
So, the xabrre is comparable to the leaders of sales.
ECS AG SiS Xabre Videocard Review –
This is the mode where the competitors have already won the authority and boast of a very good correlation of price, quality and speed. Below you will see that the Xabre is just an xabge version of the Xabre Well, the Xabre also had all those Xmart components including the Vertexlizer. For this purpose it uses several simultaneously displayed 64m each consisting of 50, triangles.
In case of the software emulation the Radeon is far ahead.
DFI SiS Xabre 400 (X400-T2) 64 MB DDR SDRAM AGP 4x/8x Graphics adapter
But I think they are slightly lifted up on the reference sample. Probably, the frequency could be even more higher, but the 3D Wizard utility coming with the drivers limits it to MHz.
In most cases it loses. It’s impossible to disable VSync forcedly, but all tests used today can do that on their own. This time we fulfilled the tests on the latest version – 3. The results are given only for 3 rendering methods – model optimized for the optimal output speed with the size of the internal vertex cache on the chip accounted for – Optimized, Unoptimized original model, and Strip – unoptimized model displayed in the form of one Triangle Strip: EMBM works, but the drop is significant.
For the fuller comparison characteristics of video cards of this and other classes address our 3Digest.
By the way, let me remind you of the articles on the Xabre based products that we have already published: Nothing special – they just glorify the AGP 8x bus which doesn’t have much to offer even for top models, however, it makes sense to use it for a 64MB card to accelerate texture transfer.
Last time the Xabre left not very good impression. Optimized Mesh This test defines a real maximum throughput of an accelerator as far as triangles are concerned. Such cards are frequent guests in our lab. The situation is strange and inverted as well!
64b for the tested samples, together with the ViewSonic P monitor and BNC Bargo cable the cards showed excellent quality at the following resolutions and frequencies: Video 3Digests Video cards: And they are emulated less efficiently than the forced emulation of the ATI’s solution.